Archive for the ‘fractals’ Category

Battlestations!

Monday, February 1st, 2010

The world’s LARGEST FRACTAL DORITO!

Pentaflakes

Saturday, February 7th, 2009

Just a link today: Mike Croucher over at Walking Randomly has some gorgeous pictures of fractal constructions called “pentaflakes”, made by recursively gluing pentagons together in various ways. He’s also made a Mathematica demonstration for playing around with various sorts of “n-flakes” interactively (you don’t need Mathematica to try it out—just the free Mathematica Player).

Carnival of Math #48, and Monday Math Madness #25

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

The 48th Carnival of Mathematics is posted at Concrete Nonsense. My favorite posts include Foxmath’s post about a strange iterated sequence involving pi and this amazing picture of a fractal cabbage. Also near and dear to my heart is Mark Dominus’s post on monads and closure operators.

Also, check out Monday Math Madness #25 over at Wild About Math!. This week’s problem is a very interesting counting problem.

Mandelbrot Maps

Monday, September 1st, 2008

Run, don’t walk, to play with the Mandelbrot Maps applet, which lets you play around with the Mandelbrot set while seeing the associated Julia sets updated in real time. This fantastic applet was created by Iain Parris, an MSc student of Philip Wadler at the University of Edinburgh. There’s even a short screencast of Iain explaining the math behind the Mandelbrot and Julia fractals and showing some of the cool things you can do with the applet.

Part of the Mandelbrot set

Carnival of Mathematics #23: Haiku Edition

Friday, December 28th, 2007

Welcome to the 23rd Carnival of Mathematics: Haiku Edition! First, I must apologize for the delay: I usually have very little trouble with my hosting provider, but of course it went down just when the CoM was supposed to be posted. But it’s free, so I can’t complain! It’s back up now, and will hopefully stay that way.

For this edition of the CoM, I decided to write a short seventeen-syllable haiku about each of the excellent seventeen submissions I received (along with additional commentary of the more prosaic variety). I’ve arranged the posts more or less in order of required mathematical background, but don’t stop halfway through because then you’ll miss the pretty pictures at the end. Enjoy!

  1. English pols want to
    make math more interesting.
    It’s not already?

    From Naomi Stevens’s Diary From England: a government bid to make maths more interesting.

  2. Neat, use perfect spheres
    to define the kilogram!
    Off by just atoms…

    Heather Lewis, of 360, writes about Australian scientists who are trying to make a perfect sphere. Pretty incredible stuff!

  3. Freshmen work in groups,
    and answer their own questions.
    Effective? Discuss.

    JackieB of Continuities explains the pedagogical approach she takes with her freshman. Be sure to read (or contribute to!) the fascinating discussion that ensues in the comments section.

  4. Multiple choice, now
    with bonus choice enhancement!
    Hard tests, nice to grade.

    Maria Andersen, at the Teaching College Math Technology Blog, shows off a new sort of multiple-choice test that’s easy to grade, but avoids many of the well-known problems with traditional multiple-choice tests. I wish I’d thought of this when I was teaching high school!

  5. Are you learning two
    languages—math AND English?
    Great sites for you here.

    Larry Ferlazzo presents a list of the best math sites for english language learners.

  6. Mathematics blogs
    are many; which are the best?
    Here’s one opinion.

    Denise of Let’s play math! writes about her favorite math blogs.

  7. I have not yet read
    “Letters To A Young Mathster”.
    I’m not missing much.

    AndrĂ©e has written a (not-too-favorable) review of Ian Stewart’s book “Letters to a Young Mathematician”, over at her blog meeyauw.

  8. Albatrosses fly
    in fractal patterns! Oh wait–
    experiment sucked.

    Julie Rehmeyer discusses how scientists are revisiting some research on fractal patterns in the flight patterns of albatross at MathTrek. Apparently, just because an albatross’s feet are dry doesn’t necessarily mean it’s flying. Who knew?

  9. Eight ninety-eight, eight
    ninety-nine, nine hundred… sigh…
    infinity yet?

    Thad Guy has a funny comic about infinity. Check out some of his other comics, too—I’m a (new) fan!

  10. Need socks in the dark?
    The pigeonhole principle
    comes to your rescue!

    Mary Pat Campbell (aka meep) presents a cute video explaining the pigeonhole principle. Did you know that at least two people in the US have the exact same number of hairs on their body? You can’t argue with math!

  11. A counting problem:
    how many bracelets are there?
    Harder than it looks…

    MathMom came across an interesting MathCounts problem involving beaded bracelets, which generated some great discussion. How would you solve it?

  12. List of rationals,
    both elegant and complete?
    Is it possible?

    Yours truly has posted the first in a planned multi-part series explaining a particularly elegant way to enumerate the positive rational numbers.

  13. Koch snowflake fractal:
    Area? Perimeter?
    Fractals are so strange…

    Over at Reasonable Deviations, rod uses geometric series to calculate the area and perimeter of the Koch snowflake. The result is rather surprising!

  14. Twelve Days of Christmas?
    How many presents is that?
    Let’s figure it out!

    Over at Wild About Math!, Sol Lederman presents a seasonally-appropriate exploration in counting presents. Fun!

  15. A tricky puzzle:
    rectangles and angle sums.
    I solved it, can you?

    JD2718 shares a gem of a puzzle involving the sum of some angles. It’s tricky—are you up to the challenge? I would especially encourage would-be solvers to come up with a nice geometric solution (I couldn’t)!

  16. Pascal’s Triangle:
    writing it out is a chore.
    How fast does it grow?

    Foxy, of FoxMaths! fame, presents an interesting two-part analysis of the asymptotic growth of the rows of Pascal’s triangle—not the growth of the actual values in the rows, but of the space needed to write them!—making use of some clever algebraic gymnastics and asymptotic analysis.

  17. In how many ways
    can the Nauru graph be drawn?
    The answer: a lot!

    David Eppstein of 0xDE presents The many faces of the Nauru graph: a collection of diverse ways to visualize a particular graph which he dubs the “Nauru graph”, due to the similarity of one of its drawings to the flag of Nauru. Planar tesselation, hyperbolic tesselation, embedding on the surface of a torus… all that and much more, with, yes, pretty pictures for everything! Even those who don’t understand the article itself should still go take a look, solely for the sake of the pictures. =)

Thanks to everyone for the great submissions, I had a fun time reading them and putting this together. The next CoM will be hosted at Ars Mathematica. As always, email Alon Levy (including “Carnival of Mathematics” in the subject line) if you’d like to host an edition.

Wait! Before you go, in honor of the new year, here’s one last link from Mike Croucher at Walking Randomly, who wants to know: what is interesting about the number 2008?

Menger sponge video

Saturday, November 10th, 2007

Check out the following totally sweet video of zooming into a Menger sponge!

This video was made by David Makin, who has lots of other cool images and videos at his website. You can probably figure out what a Menger sponge is just from watching the video, but it’s a fractal object which is very easy to make. Here’s what you do:

  1. Start with a solid cube.
  2. Slice the cube into 27 equal little cubes, by making two parallel slices in each dimension (just like a Rubik’s cube).
  3. Remove the cube in the very center, and the six cubes in the center of each face of the big cube. You’ll be left with a cube-shaped object with square holes going straight through the middle on each side.
  4. Repeat this procedure on each of the 20 remaining little cubes, and so on recursively forever.

The Wikipedia page has some nice pictures that should make this pretty clear if it’s not already. In case the video didn’t blow your mind enough, you should note that Menger sponges have zero volume but infinite surface area! (“How is that possible?!” I hear you cry in dismay. Well, infinity plays very weird games with your intuition!)

Found via God Plays Dice.

Fractal Art

Saturday, July 15th, 2006

Take a look at the fractal art of Jock Cooper — there are some amazing images there! And tons of them. Here are a couple more or less randomly chosen examples:

Fractal art #1

Fractal art #2

And there are hundreds more! He has also made several fractal animations which are very cool (and kind of trippy).

Of course, I’ve written about fractals before. Most of Jock’s images were probably made using a combination of iterated functions of various types (some using complex numbers) and various computer-assisted manipulations.

Thanks to Sam Lawrence for the link. If you ever come across cool math-related things on the web, or have an idea of something you’d like to see me write about, just drop me an e-mail!

The Mandelbrot Set

Monday, May 8th, 2006

For those of you already familiar with the Mandelbrot Set, I suppose this will be like visiting with an old friend. For those of you who aren’t — you’re in for a treat!

Okay, you say, that looks pretty cool I guess, but…huh? Well, to answer the fundamental question of “huh?” we need to dust off our Complex Number Skills. (If you don’t know what a complex number is — or need a refresher — read my explanation of complex numbers.)

Here’s what you do. Pick some complex number c and define the function

f(z) = z^2 + c

(Note that z often denotes a complex number.) Now start with z = 0 and iterate the function f, by taking each value output from the function and putting it back into the function. In other words, find f(0), f(f(0)), f(f(f(0))), f(f(f(f(0)))), and so on. For example, let’s pick c = 1 + i and follow this process for a few steps:

 $ \begin{eqnarray*} f(0) & = & 0^2 + (1 + i) = 1 + i \\ f(f(0)) & = & f(1 + i) = (1 + i)^2 + (1 + i) = 1 + 3i \\ f(f(f(0))) & = & f(1 + 3i) = (1 + 3i)^2 + (1 + i) = \dots \\ & \vdots & \end{eqnarray*} $

and so on. This is a very simple process, and can be worked out by hand fairly quickly. It can be worked out by a computer in the blink of an eye.

For some values of c, iterating the function f will tend to produce complex numbers that just get bigger and bigger. For other values of c, iterating the function will produce complex numbers that stay relatively small, no matter how long you keep iterating the function. (Of course there are technical definitions corresponding to the phrases “bigger and bigger” and “stay relatively small”, but for now we won’t worry about what they are.) Try starting with the value c = 0 + 0.1i to see an example of the latter.

Well, now we’re ready to define the Mandelbrot set: the Mandelbrot set is the set of all complex numbers c for which iterating the function f(z) = z^2 + c produces complex numbers that stay relatively small.

We can make a picture of the Mandelbrot set by letting each complex number a + bi correspond to the point with coordinates (a,b). For example, a computer can easily make a picture of the Mandelbrot set by looking at each point on the screen one by one, deciding which complex number c that point corresponds to, then (say) coloring the point black if c is in the Mandelbrot set, and white otherwise. (Often, instead of just white, programs will choose different colors for points which are not in the Mandelbrot set, based on how many iterations the program had to do before it could decide whether the point was in the set or not.)

You might think that with such a simple function, the picture would be simple as well — like a circle, or a parabola, or something like that. But in fact you get that crazy thing shown above. Iteration can make even the simplest functions behave in very complex ways!

In fact, the Mandelbrot set is what is known as a fractal, an object which is infinitely detailed and contains copies (or near-copies) of itself on all different scales. This means that (theoretically) you can keep zooming into the Mandelbrot forever, and you will always see details just as fine and complex as you do at the “top level”. Moreover, as you zoom in, you will find structures that appear to be tiny copies of the entire picture.

But don’t take my word for it — here are some nice zoomed-in pictures of the Mandelbrot set, and you can find lots more with Google image search. You might also want to download some software for viewing fractals to be able to play around with it yourself.

The most amazing thing is that no one made up these pictures — they have existed forever, built into the mathematical structure of the universe, just waiting for someone to come along and iterate a certain function and make a picture out of it. And in fact, it’s only been since the invention of computers that we’ve been able to do such things (although it’s easy to carry out the iteration described above for a particular value of c by hand, to do it for enough different values of c to make a decent picture would take so long, and be so mind-numbingly tedious, as to make it practically impossible.)

More about the Mandelbrot set, if you’re interested: